[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5018ea69-985f-417d-928e-be1ee9a80d88@bell.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 20:33:30 -0400
From: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.10 000/809] 6.10.3-rc3 review
On 2024-08-08 7:33 p.m., Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 at 15:30, John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net> wrote:
>>> I believe the shladd instruction should be changed to shladd,l (shift left and add logical).
>> diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/entry.S b/arch/parisc/kernel/entry.S
>> index ab23e61a6f01..1ec60406f841 100644
>> --- a/arch/parisc/kernel/entry.S
>> +++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/entry.S
>> @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@
>> - shladd \index,BITS_PER_PTE_ENTRY,\pmd,\pmd /* pmd is now pte */
>> + shladd,l \index,BITS_PER_PTE_ENTRY,\pmd,\pmd /* pmd is now pte */
> This doesn't seem wrong, but doesn't RFIR already restore the status word?
Yes.
>
> So even if the itlb fill modifies C/B, I don't see why that should
> actually matter.
Probably won't help unless there's a bug in qemu rfir emulation.
Dave
--
John David Anglin dave.anglin@...l.net
Powered by blists - more mailing lists