[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73d3e43c-cdf0-4ed1-9df9-fc0b8069db39@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 09:57:46 +0800
From: Alex Shi <seakeel@...il.com>
To: Vishal Moola <vishal.moola@...il.com>
Cc: alexs@...nel.org, Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@...sulko.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, minchan@...nel.org, willy@...radead.org,
senozhatsky@...omium.org, david@...hat.com, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>, nphamcs@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/22] mm/zsmalloc: add zpdesc memory descriptor for
zswap.zpool
On 8/9/24 2:21 AM, Vishal Moola wrote:
>> So I wrapped them carefully in zpdesc series functions in zpdesc.h file.
>> They should be easy replaced when we use memdescs in the future. Could we keep them
>> a while, or ?
> IMO, Its alright to keep both pages and folios due to the size reduction.
> However if we do keep both, it should be clearer that we Want zpdescs to
> be order-0 pages, and the only reason we have folios is that
> compound_head() size reduction (and nothing more). I think a comment by
> the zpdesc_folio() macro will suffice.
Right, will add some comments for this.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists