[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZrYcIr2yHjWuaJk-@shikoro>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 15:39:46 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
Cc: chris.brandt@...esas.com, andi.shyti@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, geert+renesas@...der.be,
magnus.damm@...il.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] dt-bindings: i2c: renesas,riic: Document the
R9A08G045 support
> I kept it like this to avoid confusion b/w RZ/G3S and RZ/V2H(P) documented
> below, as the RZ/G3S falls back to renesas,riic-r9a09g057 (RZ/V2H(P)).
>
> I can add a comment here, too, if you still consider necessary. Please let
> me know.
I see. I don't know how such fallbacks are documented usually, so I
won't consider it necessary. I was just wondering about it. Let's just
be consistent with previous fallbacks, however they were handled.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists