[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZrYbLDnvdJE1RYf6@shikoro>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 15:35:40 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
Cc: chris.brandt@...esas.com, andi.shyti@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, geert+renesas@...der.be,
magnus.damm@...il.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/11] i2c: riic: Add suspend/resume support
> I just checked it on next-20240809. It should be due to commit
> e1571b1fb4ff ("i2c: riic: reword according to newest specification")
> which introduced changes around riic_algo object, present also in the diff
> of this patch.
Ah, okay, this patch is the culprit. I wonder, though, because it is
already in 6.11-rc1 which was the base for my test. But you need to
resend anyhow...
> In case riic_init_hw() fails there is no recovering way for this driver,
> AFAICT, and thus there is no point in keeping the reset signal de-asserted.
Right. If it fails in resume(), then the driver will still not be removed.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists