[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240809-retired-rug-517972cde092@spud>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 16:11:15 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@...labora.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...labora.com,
Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: reset: Add rk3576 reset definitions
On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 10:49:42AM -0400, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> On Friday, 9 August 2024 10:15:12 EDT Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 08:54:52AM -0400, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> > > Add reset ID defines for rk3576.
> > >
> > > Compared to the downstream bindings this uses continous gapless
> > > reset IDs starting at 1 instead of register offsets as IDs, as
> > > introduced in the RK3588 bindings.
> > > Thus all numbers are different between upstream and downstream,
> > > but names are kept exactly the same.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@...k-chips.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@...labora.com>
> >
> > IMO squash this with the other binding patch.
>
> Yes, I wanted to but the issue is with the subject line: do I use "dt-
> bindings: reset+clock: [...]" in the squashed commit ?
Yeah, I guess you could do "dt-bindings: clock, reset:".
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists