linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] dt-bindings: net: dsa: microchip: Add KSZ8895/KSZ8864 switch support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <221d19e0-41de-4522-95fa-1adf9024b0e0@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 13:52:07 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com, Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
 UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
 Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] dt-bindings: net: dsa: microchip: Add
 KSZ8895/KSZ8864 switch support

On 09/08/2024 23:21, Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com wrote:
> From: Tristram Ha <tristram.ha@...rochip.com>
> 
> KSZ8895/KSZ8864 is a switch family developed before KSZ8795 and after
> KSZ8863, so it shares some registers and functions in those switches.
> KSZ8895 has 5 ports and so is more similar to KSZ8795.
> 
> KSZ8864 is a 4-port version of KSZ8895.  The first port is removed
> while port 5 remains as a host port.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tristram Ha <tristram.ha@...rochip.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/microchip,ksz.yaml | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Considering your earlier and later submissions were not tested, was this
one? Did you test it before sending?

Best regards,
Krzysztof