[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zro5xt05JaqJvQZe@x1>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 13:35:18 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, weilin.wang@...el.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Perry Taylor <perry.taylor@...el.com>,
Samantha Alt <samantha.alt@...el.com>,
Caleb Biggers <caleb.biggers@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v18 0/8] TPEBS counting mode support
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 08:38:06AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 7:35 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 6:32 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > For now I'm removing the whole series from perf-tools-next.
> >
> > Ugh.
>
> Hi, what's the plan here? The topdown (aka TMA) metrics on recent
> Intel CPUs (client and server) are dependent on timed PEBS. I think we
> should land this series and move forward from there.
I'm taking this as an Acked-by, merged the 3rd and 4th patches to keep
bisectability and constified the process_sample_event() perf_tool
pointer, test building with containers now.
Will push to tmp.perf-tools-next while that runs.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists