[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fXtDeddhfB8UQcjSAoWPSMo=ve1Xfr2-2K7L1LsMOQenQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 08:38:06 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, weilin.wang@...el.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Perry Taylor <perry.taylor@...el.com>, Samantha Alt <samantha.alt@...el.com>,
Caleb Biggers <caleb.biggers@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v18 0/8] TPEBS counting mode support
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 7:35 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 6:32 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> > For now I'm removing the whole series from perf-tools-next.
>
> Ugh.
Hi, what's the plan here? The topdown (aka TMA) metrics on recent
Intel CPUs (client and server) are dependent on timed PEBS. I think we
should land this series and move forward from there.
Thanks,
Ian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists