linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf lock contention: Change stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zro90YPyLCB9PsfL@x1>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 13:52:33 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf lock contention: Change stack_id type to s32

On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 01:09:40PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 12:17:04PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > The bpf_get_stackid() helper returns a signed type to check whether it
> > failed to get a stacktrace or not.  But it saved the result in u32 and
> > checked if the value is negative.
> > 
> >       376         if (needs_callstack) {
> >       377                 pelem->stack_id = bpf_get_stackid(ctx, &stacks,
> >       378                                                   BPF_F_FAST_STACK_CMP | stack_skip);
> >   --> 379                 if (pelem->stack_id < 0)
> > 
> >   ./tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c:379 contention_begin()
> >   warn: unsigned 'pelem->stack_id' is never less than zero.
> > 
> > Let's change the type to s32 instead.
> > 
> > Fixes: 6d499a6b3d90 ("perf lock: Print the number of lost entries for BPF")
> 
> Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next,

I'll try to fix this later, but now it fails the first 'make -C
tools/perf build-test' target, that you can run directly as:

⬢[acme@...lbox perf-tools-next]$ tools/perf/tests/perf-targz-src-pkg tools/perf
<SNIP>
  CLANG   /tmp/tmp.FRZLVEwqdz/perf-6.11.0-rc2/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/.tmp/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.o
In file included from util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c:9:
util/bpf_skel/lock_data.h:10:2: error: unknown type name 's32'; did you mean 'u32'?
   10 |         s32 stack_id;
      |         ^~~
      |         u32
util/bpf_skel/vmlinux.h:17:15: note: 'u32' declared here
   17 | typedef __u32 u32;
      |               ^
In file included from util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c:9:
util/bpf_skel/lock_data.h:14:2: error: unknown type name 's32'; did you mean 'u32'?
   14 |         s32 stack_id;
      |         ^~~
      |         u32
util/bpf_skel/vmlinux.h:17:15: note: 'u32' declared here
   17 | typedef __u32 u32;
      |               ^
2 errors generated.
make[2]: *** [Makefile.perf:1247: /tmp/tmp.FRZLVEwqdz/perf-6.11.0-rc2/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/.tmp/lock_contention.bpf.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[1]: *** [Makefile.perf:292: sub-make] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:76: all] Error 2
make: Leaving directory '/tmp/tmp.FRZLVEwqdz/perf-6.11.0-rc2/tools/perf'
⬢[acme@...lbox perf-tools-next]$