linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf lock contention: Change stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAM9d7ch1ESEhJW-1j0O-0xxr-w1we+opD1xWTs4Eq=u7Gg7unQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 09:57:27 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, 
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, 
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, 
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf lock contention: Change stack_id type to s32

On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 9:52 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 01:09:40PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 12:17:04PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > The bpf_get_stackid() helper returns a signed type to check whether it
> > > failed to get a stacktrace or not.  But it saved the result in u32 and
> > > checked if the value is negative.
> > >
> > >       376         if (needs_callstack) {
> > >       377                 pelem->stack_id = bpf_get_stackid(ctx, &stacks,
> > >       378                                                   BPF_F_FAST_STACK_CMP | stack_skip);
> > >   --> 379                 if (pelem->stack_id < 0)
> > >
> > >   ./tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c:379 contention_begin()
> > >   warn: unsigned 'pelem->stack_id' is never less than zero.
> > >
> > > Let's change the type to s32 instead.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 6d499a6b3d90 ("perf lock: Print the number of lost entries for BPF")
> >
> > Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next,
>
> I'll try to fix this later, but now it fails the first 'make -C
> tools/perf build-test' target, that you can run directly as:
>
> ⬢[acme@...lbox perf-tools-next]$ tools/perf/tests/perf-targz-src-pkg tools/perf
> <SNIP>
>   CLANG   /tmp/tmp.FRZLVEwqdz/perf-6.11.0-rc2/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/.tmp/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.o
> In file included from util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c:9:
> util/bpf_skel/lock_data.h:10:2: error: unknown type name 's32'; did you mean 'u32'?
>    10 |         s32 stack_id;
>       |         ^~~
>       |         u32
> util/bpf_skel/vmlinux.h:17:15: note: 'u32' declared here
>    17 | typedef __u32 u32;
>       |               ^

Oops, sorry about this.  There was a kernel test robot report.
It seems we need 'typedef __s32 s32;' too.

Thanks,
Namhyung


> In file included from util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c:9:
> util/bpf_skel/lock_data.h:14:2: error: unknown type name 's32'; did you mean 'u32'?
>    14 |         s32 stack_id;
>       |         ^~~
>       |         u32
> util/bpf_skel/vmlinux.h:17:15: note: 'u32' declared here
>    17 | typedef __u32 u32;
>       |               ^
> 2 errors generated.
> make[2]: *** [Makefile.perf:1247: /tmp/tmp.FRZLVEwqdz/perf-6.11.0-rc2/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/.tmp/lock_contention.bpf.o] Error 1
> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make[1]: *** [Makefile.perf:292: sub-make] Error 2
> make: *** [Makefile:76: all] Error 2
> make: Leaving directory '/tmp/tmp.FRZLVEwqdz/perf-6.11.0-rc2/tools/perf'
> ⬢[acme@...lbox perf-tools-next]$