[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZrpS7zJpa+YJZfjQ@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 14:22:39 -0400
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"open list:ETHERNET PHY LIBRARY" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: net: mdio: Add negative patten match
for child node
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 05:44:50PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 11:11:14PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> > mdio.yaml wrong parser mdio controller's address instead phy's address when
> > mdio-mux exist.
> >
> > For example:
> > mdio-mux-emi1@54 {
> > compatible = "mdio-mux-mmioreg", "mdio-mux";
> >
> > mdio@20 {
> > reg = <0x20>;
> > ^^^ This is mdio controller register
> >
> > ethernet-phy@2 {
> > reg = <0x2>;
> > ^^^ This phy's address
> > };
> > };
> > };
>
> I don't understand MDIO well enough to know the answer - does this
> actually solve the problem? It seems to me that the problem is that
> mdio.yaml is applied to the mdio-mux node because it matches the pattern
> "^mdio(@.*)?" that applies the binding based on node-names. If the
> properties in mdio.yaml do not apply to mdio muxes, then the binding
> should not be applied and the patch here is only treating a symptom
> rather than the actual problem.
after I change above example 0x2 to 0x22, mdio.yaml can report exceed 31.
Only issue should be only when "ethernet-phy" use node name "mdio".
>
> From a quick check, I don't see any of the mdio-mux-mmioreg nodes using
> the properties from mdio.yaml, so should the binding be applied to them
> at all?
in mdio-mux-mmioreg.yaml line 18:
allOf:
- $ref: /schemas/net/mdio-mux.yaml#
in mdio-mux.yaml
patternProperties:
'^mdio@[0-9a-f]+$': -> A
$ref: mdio.yaml#
In mdio.yaml
properties:
$nodename:
pattern: "^mdio(@.*)?
^^^^^ mdio@20 Match condition A, it should correct.
patternProperties:
'@[0-9a-f]+$':
^^^^ mdio@20 also match this one. but I suppose it should
search mdio@...s child node, such as ethernet-phy@2,
but not.
Frank
>
> Cheers,
> Conor.
>
>
> FWIW, adding a $ after the ? in the pattern I linked would stop the
> binding being applied to the mdio-mux nodes, but if something like that
> were done, all mdio nodes would need to be checked to ensure they match
> the new pattern...
>
>
> >
> > Only phy's address is limited to 31 because MDIO bus defination.
> >
> > But CHECK_DTBS report below warning:
> >
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1043a-qds.dtb: mdio-mux-emi1@54:
> > mdio@20:reg:0:0: 32 is greater than the maximum of 31
> >
> > The reason is that "mdio@20" match "patternProperties: '@[0-9a-f]+$'" in
> > mdio.yaml.
> >
> > Change to '^(?!mdio@).*@[0-9a-f]+$' to avoid match parent's mdio
> > controller's address.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mdio.yaml | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mdio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mdio.yaml
> > index a266ade918ca7..a7def3eb4674d 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mdio.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mdio.yaml
> > @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ properties:
> > type: boolean
> >
> > patternProperties:
> > - '@[0-9a-f]+$':
> > + '^(?!mdio@).*@[0-9a-f]+$':
> > type: object
> >
> > properties:
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists