linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] mptcp: correct MPTCP_SUBFLOW_ATTR_SSN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240812142547.7c048af7@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 14:25:47 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>
Cc: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>, mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, Mat
 Martineau <martineau@...nel.org>, Geliang Tang <geliang@...nel.org>, "David
 S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo
 Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] mptcp: correct
 MPTCP_SUBFLOW_ATTR_SSN_OFFSET reserved size

On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 09:43:29 +0200 Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> @Network maintainers: is it OK for you to apply this v2 in "net", not
> "net-next"? Or is it easier for you to have a v3 with a different prefix?
> 
> (No conflicts to apply this patch on -net, the code didn't change for 4
> years.)

Looks trivial, should be safe to cross-apply, no need for v3.