[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5081c41b-dfbd-49ad-a993-b983d4c339f0@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 10:16:05 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2700 clock bindings
On 12/08/2024 09:26, Ryan Chen wrote:
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2700 clock bindings
>>
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2700 clock
>>> bindings
>>>
>>> On 09/08/2024 07:47, Ryan Chen wrote:
>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2700 clock
>>>>> bindings
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 08/08/2024 à 09:59, Ryan Chen a écrit :
>>>>>> Add dt bindings for AST2700 clock controller
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> .../dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h | 175
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 175 insertions(+)
>>>>>> create mode 100644
>>>>>> include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h
>>>>>> b/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h
>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>> index 000000000000..facf72352c3e
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h
>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
>>>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) */
>>>>>> +/*
>>>>>> + * Device Tree binding constants for AST2700 clock controller.
>>>>>> + *
>>>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2024 Aspeed Technology Inc.
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +#ifndef __DT_BINDINGS_CLOCK_AST2700_H #define
>>>>>> +__DT_BINDINGS_CLOCK_AST2700_H
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +/* SOC0 clk-gate */
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_MCLK (0)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_ECLK (1)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_2DCLK (2)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_VCLK (3)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_BCLK (4)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_VGA0CLK (5)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_REFCLK (6)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_PORTBUSB2CLK (7) #define
>>> SCU0_CLK_GATE_RSV8
>>>>>> +(8)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_UHCICLK (9)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_VGA1CLK (10)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_DDRPHYCLK (11)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_E2M0CLK (12)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_HACCLK (13)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_PORTAUSB2CLK (14)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_UART4CLK (15)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_SLICLK (16)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_DACCLK (17)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_DP (18)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_E2M1CLK (19)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_CRT0CLK (20)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_CRT1CLK (21)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_VLCLK (22)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_ECDSACLK (23)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_RSACLK (24)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_RVAS0CLK (25)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_UFSCLK (26)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_EMMCCLK (27)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_RVAS1CLK (28)
>>>>>> +/* reserved 29 ~ 31*/
>>>
>>> No, you cannot reserve IDs. They are always continous.
>> I think for mis-understood.
>> I will remove the comment.
>> And keep it is continuous. Thanks.
>>>
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_NUM (SCU0_CLK_GATE_RVAS1CLK + 1)
>>>
>>> No, not a binding.
>>
> I will modify by following.
>
> #define SCU0_CLK_GATE_RVAS1CLK (28)
> #define SCU0_CLK_GATE_NUM (SCU0_CLK_GATE_RVAS1CLK + 1)
Nothing changed. Still not a binding. Why do you send the same and
expect different result? Drop.
Address feedback sent to you from previous versions of the patchset.
There was never a reply.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists