[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<OS8PR06MB7541196D3058904998820CFFF2852@OS8PR06MB7541.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 08:22:57 +0000
From: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Christophe JAILLET
<christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, Andrew Jeffery
<andrew@...econstruct.com.au>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2700 clock bindings
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2700 clock bindings
>
> On 12/08/2024 09:26, Ryan Chen wrote:
> >> Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2700 clock
> >> bindings
> >>
> >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2700 clock
> >>> bindings
> >>>
> >>> On 09/08/2024 07:47, Ryan Chen wrote:
> >>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2700 clock
> >>>>> bindings
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Le 08/08/2024 à 09:59, Ryan Chen a écrit :
> >>>>>> Add dt bindings for AST2700 clock controller
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> .../dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h | 175
> >>>>> ++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>> 1 file changed, 175 insertions(+)
> >>>>>> create mode 100644
> >>>>>> include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h
> >>>>>> b/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h
> >>>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>>> index 000000000000..facf72352c3e
> >>>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h
> >>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
> >>>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) */
> >>>>>> +/*
> >>>>>> + * Device Tree binding constants for AST2700 clock controller.
> >>>>>> + *
> >>>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2024 Aspeed Technology Inc.
> >>>>>> + */
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +#ifndef __DT_BINDINGS_CLOCK_AST2700_H #define
> >>>>>> +__DT_BINDINGS_CLOCK_AST2700_H
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +/* SOC0 clk-gate */
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_MCLK (0)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_ECLK (1)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_2DCLK (2)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_VCLK (3)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_BCLK (4)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_VGA0CLK (5)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_REFCLK (6)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_PORTBUSB2CLK (7) #define
> >>> SCU0_CLK_GATE_RSV8
> >>>>>> +(8)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_UHCICLK (9)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_VGA1CLK (10)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_DDRPHYCLK (11)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_E2M0CLK (12)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_HACCLK (13)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_PORTAUSB2CLK (14)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_UART4CLK (15)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_SLICLK (16)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_DACCLK (17)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_DP (18)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_E2M1CLK (19)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_CRT0CLK (20)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_CRT1CLK (21)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_VLCLK (22)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_ECDSACLK (23)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_RSACLK (24)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_RVAS0CLK (25)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_UFSCLK (26)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_EMMCCLK (27)
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_RVAS1CLK (28)
> >>>>>> +/* reserved 29 ~ 31*/
> >>>
> >>> No, you cannot reserve IDs. They are always continous.
> >> I think for mis-understood.
> >> I will remove the comment.
> >> And keep it is continuous. Thanks.
> >>>
> >>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_NUM (SCU0_CLK_GATE_RVAS1CLK + 1)
> >>>
> >>> No, not a binding.
> >>
> > I will modify by following.
> >
> > #define SCU0_CLK_GATE_RVAS1CLK (28)
> > #define SCU0_CLK_GATE_NUM (SCU0_CLK_GATE_RVAS1CLK + 1)
>
> Nothing changed. Still not a binding. Why do you send the same and expect
> different result? Drop.
>
> Address feedback sent to you from previous versions of the patchset.
> There was never a reply.
Sorry, mis-understood.
Since you think "#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_NUM" not a binding.
Do you mean I should #define SCU0_CLK_GATE_NUM in clk driver, not in binding header, am I right?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists