[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240813145002.GB31977@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 16:50:03 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jolsa@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] uprobes: make trace_uprobe->nhit counter a per-CPU one
On 08/09, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>
> @@ -815,13 +824,21 @@ static int probes_profile_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> {
> struct dyn_event *ev = v;
> struct trace_uprobe *tu;
> + unsigned long nhits;
> + int cpu;
>
> if (!is_trace_uprobe(ev))
> return 0;
>
> tu = to_trace_uprobe(ev);
> +
> + nhits = 0;
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + nhits += READ_ONCE(*per_cpu_ptr(tu->nhits, cpu));
why not
nhits += per_cpu(*tu->nhits, cpu);
?
See for example per_cpu_sum() or nr_processes(), per_cpu() should work just fine...
Other than that
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists