[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZrryAFGBCG1cyfOA@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 22:41:20 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Martin Oliveira <martin.oliveira@...eticom.com>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Artemy Kovalyov <artemyko@...dia.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Michael Guralnik <michaelgur@...dia.com>,
Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>,
Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
David Sloan <david.sloan@...eticom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] mm/gup: allow FOLL_LONGTERM & FOLL_PCI_P2PDMA
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 08:12:49PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > This is unfortunately not really minor unless we have a well documented
> > way to force this :(
>
> It is not that different from blocking driver unbind while FDs are
> open which a lot of places do in various ways?
Where do we block driver unbind with an open resource? The whole
concept is that open resources will pin the in-memory object (and
modulo for a modular driver), but never an unbind or hardware
unplug, of which unbind really just is a simulation.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists