[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZrsgPHPVp7HelXkH@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 11:58:36 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] irqdomain: Unify checks for bus_token
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 10:32:44AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12 2024 at 22:29, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The code uses if (bus_token) and if (bus_token == DOMAIN_BUS_ANY).
> > Since bus_token is enum, the later is more robust against changes.
> > Unify all checks to follow the latter variant.
> >
> > Fixes: 0b21add71bd9 ("irqdomain: Handle domain bus token in irq_domain_create()")
> > Fixes: 1bf2c9282927 ("irqdomain: Cleanup domain name allocation")
>
> I'm fine with the change per se, but what does this fix? It's correct
> code, no?
Technically yes, it's correct code as long as nobody touches the mentioned enum.
It fixes the style and makes it robust against the changes.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists