linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3: Allow unused SGIs for drivers/modules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <86zfpgztmt.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 09:58:34 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3: Allow unused SGIs for drivers/modules

On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 04:39:25 +0100,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com> wrote:
> 
> The commit 897e9e60c016 ("firmware: arm_ffa: Initial support for scheduler
> receiver interrupt") adds support for SGI interrupts in the FFA driver.
> However, the validation for SGIs in the GICv3 is too strict, causing the
> driver probe to fail.

It probably is a good thing that I wasn't on Cc for this patch,
because I would have immediately NAK'd it. Sudeep, please consider
this a retrospective NAK!

> 
> This patch relaxes the SGI validation check, allowing callers to use SGIs
> if the requested SGI number is greater than or equal to MAX_IPI, which
> fixes the TFA driver probe failure.
> 
> This issue is observed on NVIDIA server platform with FFA-v1.1.
>  [    7.918099] PTP clock support registered
>  [    7.922110] EDAC MC: Ver: 3.0.0
>  [    7.945063] ARM FF-A: Driver version 1.1
>  [    7.949068] ARM FF-A: Firmware version 1.1 found
>  [    7.977832] GICv3: [Firmware Bug]: Illegal GSI8 translation request
>  [    7.984237] ARM FF-A: Failed to create IRQ mapping!
>  [    7.989220] ARM FF-A: Notification setup failed -61, not enabled
>  [    8.000198] ARM FF-A: Failed to register driver sched callback -95
>  [    8.011322] scmi_core: SCMI protocol bus registered
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c             | 17 -----------------
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c        |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
> index 9e96f024b2f19..ecf81df2915c7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
> @@ -188,5 +188,22 @@ static inline bool gic_has_relaxed_pmr_sync(void)
>  	return cpus_have_cap(ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_RELAXED_SYNC);
>  }
>  
> +enum ipi_msg_type {
> +	IPI_RESCHEDULE,
> +	IPI_CALL_FUNC,
> +	IPI_CPU_STOP,
> +	IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP,
> +	IPI_TIMER,
> +	IPI_IRQ_WORK,
> +	NR_IPI,
> +	/*
> +	 * Any enum >= NR_IPI and < MAX_IPI is special and not tracable
> +	 * with trace_ipi_*
> +	 */
> +	IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE = NR_IPI,
> +	IPI_KGDB_ROUNDUP,
> +	MAX_IPI
> +};
> +
>  #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>  #endif /* __ASM_ARCH_GICV3_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> index 5e18fbcee9a20..373cd815d9a43 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -64,23 +64,6 @@ struct secondary_data secondary_data;
>  /* Number of CPUs which aren't online, but looping in kernel text. */
>  static int cpus_stuck_in_kernel;
>  
> -enum ipi_msg_type {
> -	IPI_RESCHEDULE,
> -	IPI_CALL_FUNC,
> -	IPI_CPU_STOP,
> -	IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP,
> -	IPI_TIMER,
> -	IPI_IRQ_WORK,
> -	NR_IPI,
> -	/*
> -	 * Any enum >= NR_IPI and < MAX_IPI is special and not tracable
> -	 * with trace_ipi_*
> -	 */
> -	IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE = NR_IPI,
> -	IPI_KGDB_ROUNDUP,
> -	MAX_IPI
> -};
> -
>  static int ipi_irq_base __ro_after_init;
>  static int nr_ipi __ro_after_init = NR_IPI;
>  static struct irq_desc *ipi_desc[MAX_IPI] __ro_after_init;
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> index c19083bfb9432..0d2038d8cd311 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> @@ -1655,7 +1655,7 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
>  		if(fwspec->param_count != 2)
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  
> -		if (fwspec->param[0] < 16) {
> +		if (fwspec->param[0] < MAX_IPI) {
>  			pr_err(FW_BUG "Illegal GSI%d translation request\n",
>  			       fwspec->param[0]);
>  			return -EINVAL;

No. This is the wrong approach, and leads to inconsistent behaviour if
we ever change this MAX_IPI value. It also breaks 32 bit builds, and
makes things completely inconsistent between ACPI and DT.

I don't know how the FFA code was tested, because I cannot see how it
can work.

*IF* we are going to allow random SGIs being requested by random
drivers, we need to be able to do it properly. Not as a side hack like
this.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.