linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: iio: adc: sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml: Add Sophgo CV18XX SARADC binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f868dee1-0007-44a1-9fbf-d6a0fdcf4837@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 11:50:59 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Bonnefille <thomas.bonnefille@...tlin.com>,
 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>,
 Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>,
 Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt
 <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
 Miquèl Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
 linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: iio: adc: sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml:
 Add Sophgo CV18XX SARADC binding

On 12/08/2024 17:00, Thomas Bonnefille wrote:
> The Sophgo SARADC is a Successive Approximation ADC that can be found in
> the Sophgo SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Bonnefille <thomas.bonnefille@...tlin.com>


<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully
addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you
just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and
either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them.

Thank you.
</form letter>

.. and more ignored comments further.

> ---
>  .../bindings/iio/adc/sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml     | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..846590808e5f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/adc/sophgo,cv18xx-saradc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title:
> +  Sophgo CV18XX SoC series 3 channels Successive Approximation Analog to
> +  Digital Converters
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Thomas Bonnefille <thomas.bonnefille@...tlin.com>
> +
> +description:
> +  Datasheet at https://github.com/sophgo/sophgo-doc/releases
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    const: sophgo,cv1800b-saradc
> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  interrupts:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  clocks:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  '#address-cells':
> +    const: 1
> +
> +  '#size-cells':
> +    const: 0
> +
> +patternProperties:
> +  "^channel@[0-3]+$":
> +    $ref: adc.yaml
> +
> +    description: |
> +      Represents the channels of the ADC.
> +
> +    properties:
> +      reg:
> +        description: |
> +          The channel number. It can have up to 3 channels numbered from 0 to 2.
> +        items:
> +          - minimum: 0
> +            maximum: 2
> +
> +    required:
> +      - reg
> +
> +    additionalProperties: false
> +
> +

Just one blank line.

> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - clocks
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false

No, how did this appear here? This must be additionalProperties.

I already commented on this.

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully
addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you
just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and
either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them.

Thank you.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof