lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240814-riveting-prenatal-1b6892877da5@spud>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:06:49 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cc: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
	Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>,
	Martin Sperl <kernel@...tin.sperl.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 0/9] spi: axi-spi-engine: add offload support

On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 09:58:30AM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 04:57:07PM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> > There is a recap at the end of this cover letter for those not familiar
> > with the previous discussions. For those that are, we'll get right to
> > the changes since the last version.
> > 
> > In RFC v2, most of the discussion was around the DT bindings, so that
> > is what has mostly changed since then. I think we mostly settled on
> > what properties are needed and where they should go. There are probably
> > still some details to work out (see PATCH 5/9 for more discussion) but
> > I think we have the big-picture stuff figured out.
> 
> Thanks for the updates. I'm on holiday until rc2, so it'll not be until
> then that I can really take a look at this. Figured I'd let you know
> rather than just ignore you...

Finally got around to actually looking at the binding patches, but since
Rob got there before me I didn't have all that much to say. Thanks for
looking into the graph idea, and I think I agree that it is worth
excluding that until you're actually going to use the crc checker etc.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ