[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZrzWUg4SGJv7Byp6@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 09:07:46 -0700
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Geliang Tang <geliang@...nel.org>,
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: netconsole: selftests: Create a new
netconsole selftest
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 12:24:46PM +0200, Petr Machata wrote:
>
> Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org> writes:
> > + fi
> > +
> > + if ! grep -q "${MSG}" "${TMPFILENAME}"; then
> > + echo "FAIL: ${MSG} not found in ${TMPFILENAME}" >&2
> > + cat "${TMPFILENAME}" >&2
> > + return ${ksft_fail}
> > + fi
> > +
> > + # Delete the file once it is validated, otherwise keep it
> > + # for debugging purposes
> > + rm "${TMPFILENAME}"
>
> Seeing the removal within the validation function is odd, I would expect
> it to be part of cleanup().
Thanks for all the other feedbacks, all of them make sense.
Regarding this one, I kept like this, because I only remove the file if
the test succeed, otherwise I keep the file here for debugging purposes,
as described in the comment above.
If that is not a good practice, I am more than happy to move this
to cleanup.
Thanks for the detailed review,
--breno
Powered by blists - more mailing lists