linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: drop lruvec->lru_lock if contended when skipping folio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <64e9c1b6-79da-488d-8e7f-8b3fce3d14c1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:17:30 +0100
From: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@...il.com>
To: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...hat.com, leitao@...ian.org,
 huangzhaoyang@...il.com, bharata@....com, willy@...radead.org,
 vbabka@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: drop lruvec->lru_lock if contended when skipping
 folio



On 14/08/2024 17:01, Yu Zhao wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 8:26 AM Usama Arif <usamaarif642@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
> 
> I think in case the patch should be "From" you, "Suggested-by" me, and
> "Reported-by" and "Tested-by" Bharata.

Sounds good, will change it in next revision. I will wait for a couple of days to see if there is feedback on the patch and resend with what you have suggested.

Thanks!