[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3e7cf9f9-abab-4249-9e7b-71f237850bdf@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 10:27:48 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Kyoungrul Kim <k831.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ufs: core: Rename LSDB to SDBS to reflect the UFSHCI
4.0 spec
On 8/14/24 10:15 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay wrote:
> UFSHCI 4.0 spec names the 'Legacy Queue & Single Doorbell Support' field in
> Controller Capabilities register as 'SDBS'. So let's use the same
> terminology in the driver to align with the spec.
If a rename happens, we should use the name from the spec. I found the
following in the UFSHCI 4.0 specification: "Legacy Single DoorBell
Support (LSDBS)". So please either rename SDBS into LSDBS or drop this
patch.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists