[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a838d867-def7-49f8-b9cf-9f4d638ff2d6@siemens.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 06:49:39 +0200
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Bao Cheng Su <baocheng.su@...mens.com>, Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@...mens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: soc: ti: am645-system-controller: add
child nodes used by main domain
On 13.08.24 17:40, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 08:04:59AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
>>
>> Expand bindings to cover both the MCU and the main usage of the AM654
>> system controller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
>> ---
>> .../soc/ti/ti,am654-system-controller.yaml | 25 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,am654-system-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,am654-system-controller.yaml
>> index e79803e586ca..5a689ec3c5c9 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,am654-system-controller.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,am654-system-controller.yaml
>> @@ -29,11 +29,36 @@ properties:
>>
>> ranges: true
>>
>> + mux-controller:
>> + type: object
>> + ref: /schemas/mux/reg-mux.yaml#
>> + description:
>> + This is the SERDES lane control mux.
>> +
>> patternProperties:
>> "^phy@[0-9a-f]+$":
>> type: object
>> $ref: /schemas/phy/ti,phy-gmii-sel.yaml#
>>
>> + "^clock@[0-9a-f]+$":
>
> Could you explain to me why these are all patternProperties? Why are the
> addresses of these things not fixed for an am654?
>
I could indeed spell out dss-oldi-io-ctrl@...0 and
clock-controller@...0, and their addresses are likely fixed, indeed. But
there are also clock@...0 and clock@...0 - should I duplicate their
object descriptions while moving them to the regular properties?
Jan
>> + type: object
>> + $ref: /schemas/soc/ti/ti,am654-serdes-ctrl.yaml#
>> +
>> + "^dss-oldi-io-ctrl@[0-9a-f]+$":
>> + type: object
>> + $ref: /schemas/mfd/syscon.yaml#
>> + properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + items:
>> + - const: ti,am654-dss-oldi-io-ctrl
>> + - const: syscon
>> +
>> + "^clock-controller@[0-9a-f]+$":
>> + type: object
>> + $ref: /schemas/clock/ti,am654-ehrpwm-tbclk.yaml#
>> + description:
>> + Clock provider for TI EHRPWM nodes.
>> +
>> required:
>> - compatible
>> - reg
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
--
Siemens AG, Technology
Linux Expert Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists