linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 1/2 RESEND] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add DTS for FriendlyARM NanoPi R2S Plus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <D3FLMBPACMF8.249JV2GI2QGHA@cknow.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 13:30:17 +0200
From: "Diederik de Haas" <didi.debian@...ow.org>
To: "Sergey 'Jin' Bostandzhyan" <jin@...iatomb.cc>,
 Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: "Daniel Golle" <daniel@...rotopia.org>, <robh@...nel.org>,
 <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2 RESEND] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add DTS for
 FriendlyARM NanoPi R2S Plus

On Wed Aug 14, 2024 at 1:21 PM CEST, Sergey 'Jin' Bostandzhyan wrote:
> In case you tell me to go ahead with a v3 set, should it be in this
> thread or not? I understood RESEND's should be new, but updates should
> stay in the thread, right?

No, a new series should be its own thread too.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)