lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D3FLPC79YN2S.34PAJFECP21X9@cknow.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 13:34:13 +0200
From: "Diederik de Haas" <didi.debian@...ow.org>
To: "Sergey 'Jin' Bostandzhyan" <jin@...iatomb.cc>,
 Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: "Daniel Golle" <daniel@...rotopia.org>, <robh@...nel.org>,
 <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2 RESEND] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add DTS for
 FriendlyARM NanoPi R2S Plus

On Wed Aug 14, 2024 at 1:30 PM CEST, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Wed Aug 14, 2024 at 1:21 PM CEST, Sergey 'Jin' Bostandzhyan wrote:
> > In case you tell me to go ahead with a v3 set, should it be in this
> > thread or not? I understood RESEND's should be new, but updates should
> > stay in the thread, right?
>
> No, a new series should be its own thread too.

More correctly and hopefully more clearly:

No, a new patch version (series) should be its own thread too.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ