linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] ufs: core: Rename LSDB to SDBS to reflect the UFSHCI 4.0 spec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240815033627.GA2562@thinkpad>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 09:06:27 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Kyoungrul Kim <k831.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ufs: core: Rename LSDB to SDBS to reflect the UFSHCI
 4.0 spec

On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 10:27:48AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 8/14/24 10:15 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay wrote:
> > UFSHCI 4.0 spec names the 'Legacy Queue & Single Doorbell Support' field in
> > Controller Capabilities register as 'SDBS'. So let's use the same
> > terminology in the driver to align with the spec.
> 
> If a rename happens, we should use the name from the spec. I found the
> following in the UFSHCI 4.0 specification: "Legacy Single DoorBell Support
> (LSDBS)". So please either rename SDBS into LSDBS or drop this
> patch.
> 

Hmm. I looked into the editorial version of the 4.0 spec that I got access to
and that used SDBS. Maybe that got changed in the final version. Will change it
to LSDBS.

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்