linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] fs/file.c: remove sanity_check and add likely/unlikely in alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3f9d30bf-df46-492a-a82b-7e2eb090ea69@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 16:34:15 +0800
From: "Ma, Yu" <yu.ma@...el.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: brauner@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz, mjguzik@...il.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
 linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 pan.deng@...el.com, tianyou.li@...el.com, tim.c.chen@...el.com,
 tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, yu.ma@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] fs/file.c: remove sanity_check and add
 likely/unlikely in alloc_fd()


On 8/15/2024 11:45 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 10:49:40AM +0800, Ma, Yu wrote:
>
>> Yes, thanks Al, fully agree with you. The if (error) could be removed here
>> as the above unlikely would make sure no 0 return here. Should I submit
>> another version of patch set to update it, or you may help to update it
>> directly during merge? I'm not very familiar with the rules, please let me
>> know if I'd update and I'll take action soon. Thanks again for your careful
>> check here.
> See the current work.fdtable...
Saw it, thanks :)