[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGudoHEu07q72u_XFH61kGXyKr+vAqGFhn_tSSu6U2uMDABLdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 08:42:18 +0100
From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "Ma, Yu" <yu.ma@...el.com>, brauner@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz, edumazet@...gle.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pan.deng@...el.com, tianyou.li@...el.com, tim.c.chen@...el.com,
tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] fs/file.c: remove sanity_check and add
likely/unlikely in alloc_fd()
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 5:45 AM Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 10:49:40AM +0800, Ma, Yu wrote:
>
> > Yes, thanks Al, fully agree with you. The if (error) could be removed here
> > as the above unlikely would make sure no 0 return here. Should I submit
> > another version of patch set to update it, or you may help to update it
> > directly during merge? I'm not very familiar with the rules, please let me
> > know if I'd update and I'll take action soon. Thanks again for your careful
> > check here.
>
> See the current work.fdtable...
this patchset seems to have fallen through the cracks. anything
holding up the merge?
--
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists