linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] fs/file.c: remove sanity_check and add likely/unlikely in alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241031-anraten-dorthin-4e01a39b46bf@brauner>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 11:14:42 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, "Ma, Yu" <yu.ma@...el.com>, 
	jack@...e.cz, edumazet@...gle.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pan.deng@...el.com, tianyou.li@...el.com, tim.c.chen@...el.com, 
	tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] fs/file.c: remove sanity_check and add
 likely/unlikely in alloc_fd()

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 08:42:18AM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 5:45 AM Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 10:49:40AM +0800, Ma, Yu wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, thanks Al, fully agree with you. The if (error) could be removed here
> > > as the above unlikely would make sure no 0 return here. Should I submit
> > > another version of patch set to update it, or you may help to update it
> > > directly during merge? I'm not very familiar with the rules, please let me
> > > know if I'd update and I'll take action soon. Thanks again for your careful
> > > check here.
> >
> > See the current work.fdtable...
> 
> this patchset seems to have fallen through the cracks. anything
> holding up the merge?

It's in next for this merge window.