linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rust: Remove erronous blockquote in coding guidelines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72nN+x9FR8whpiEFtUr+4gkBN=pfw6URO9VO31qtX7=5Bg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 11:32:45 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: vincent@...tmann.art
Cc: rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, 
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>, 
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, 
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>, 
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Julian Merkle <me@...erkle.de>, 
	Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>, 
	Adam Bratschi-Kaye <ark.email@...il.com>, "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, 
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: Remove erronous blockquote in coding guidelines

On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 11:26 AM Vincent Woltmann <vincent@...tmann.art> wrote:
>
> -    While sometimes the reason might look trivial and therefore unneeded,
> -    writing these comments is not just a good way of documenting what has been
> -    taken into account, but most importantly, it provides a way to know that
> -    there are no *extra* implicit constraints.
> +While sometimes the reason might look trivial and therefore unneeded,
> +writing these comments is not just a good way of documenting what has been
> +taken into account, but most importantly, it provides a way to know that
> +there are no *extra* implicit constraints.

Doesn't this part of the change make the paragraph be outside its bullet?

Thanks for the patch!

Cheers,
Miguel