linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rust: Remove erronous blockquote in coding guidelines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2130133683.467462.1723812373582@office.mailbox.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 14:46:13 +0200 (CEST)
From: Vincent Woltmann <vincent@...tmann.art>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
	Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Julian Merkle <me@...erkle.de>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
	Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>,
	Adam Bratschi-Kaye <ark.email@...il.com>,
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: Remove erronous blockquote in coding guidelines

> Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> hat am 16.08.2024 11:32 CEST geschrieben:
> 
>  
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 11:26 AM Vincent Woltmann <vincent@...tmann.art> wrote:
> >
> > -    While sometimes the reason might look trivial and therefore unneeded,
> > -    writing these comments is not just a good way of documenting what has been
> > -    taken into account, but most importantly, it provides a way to know that
> > -    there are no *extra* implicit constraints.
> > +While sometimes the reason might look trivial and therefore unneeded,
> > +writing these comments is not just a good way of documenting what has been
> > +taken into account, but most importantly, it provides a way to know that
> > +there are no *extra* implicit constraints.
> 
> Doesn't this part of the change make the paragraph be outside its bullet?

Yes, you are quite right, I must have missed that. Thank you for the feedback and I will prepare a new patch

Have a great day,

Vincent