lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5fd97d54-fa64-4c03-865f-961ed4596a6e@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 07:11:54 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Abhinav Jain <jain.abhinav177@...il.com>, shuah@...nel.org,
 brauner@...nel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: filesystems: fix warn_unused_result build
 warnings

On 8/10/24 07:53, Abhinav Jain wrote:
> Add return value checks for read & write calls in test_listmount_ns
> function. This patch resolves below compilation warnings:
> 
> ```
> statmount_test_ns.c: In function ‘test_listmount_ns’:
> 
> statmount_test_ns.c:322:17: warning: ignoring return value of ‘write’
> declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result]
> 
> statmount_test_ns.c:323:17: warning: ignoring return value of ‘read’
> declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result]
> ```
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Jain <jain.abhinav177@...il.com>
> ---
>   .../selftests/filesystems/statmount/statmount_test_ns.c    | 7 +++++--
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/statmount/statmount_test_ns.c b/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/statmount/statmount_test_ns.c
> index e044f5fc57fd..70cb0c8b21cf 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/statmount/statmount_test_ns.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/statmount/statmount_test_ns.c
> @@ -319,8 +319,11 @@ static void test_listmount_ns(void)
>   		 * Tell our parent how many mounts we have, and then wait for it
>   		 * to tell us we're done.
>   		 */
> -		write(child_ready_pipe[1], &nr_mounts, sizeof(nr_mounts));
> -		read(parent_ready_pipe[0], &cval, sizeof(cval));
> +		if (write(child_ready_pipe[1], &nr_mounts, sizeof(nr_mounts)) !=
> +					sizeof(nr_mounts))
> +			ret = NSID_ERROR;
> +		if (read(parent_ready_pipe[0], &cval, sizeof(cval)) != sizeof(cval))
> +			ret = NSID_ERROR;
>   		exit(NSID_PASS);
>   	}
>   

Hi Christian,

Let me know if it is okay to take this patch through kselftest tree.
The change looks good to me.

thanks,
-- Shuah

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ