[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <05f75fda-d61f-45c7-9b21-85cbbae754a3@roeck-us.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 20:34:39 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"open list:HARDWARE MONITORING" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: hwmon/regulator: Convert ltc2978.txt to
yaml
On 8/16/24 19:01, Frank Li wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 05:03:16PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 8/16/24 14:55, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 02:17:26PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
>>>> Convert binding doc ltc2978.txt to yaml format.
>>>> Additional change:
>>>> - add i2c node.
>>>> - basic it is regulator according to example, move it under regulator.
>>>>
>>>> Fix below warning:
>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a-clearfog-cx.dtb: /soc/i2c@...0000/i2c-mux@...i2c@...egulator@5c:
>>>> failed to match any schema with compatible: ['lltc,ltc3882']
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ltc2978.txt | 62 ------------
>>>> .../bindings/regulator/lltc,ltc2972.yaml | 94 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>>>> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ltc2978.txt
>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/lltc,ltc2972.yaml
>>>
>>> I'm on the fence whether to move this...
>>>
>>
>> I don't really understand the rationale behind the move nor the rationale behind
>> the rename, but then I don't really care or mind as long as no one claims that
>> the _driver_ should be moved because the devicetree bindings moved.
>
> Conor suggest use one of compatible string as file name.
>
> I just help convert it. I am not familar with this chip at all.
>
> According to original docuemnt, most talk about regular instead of hwmon.
>
> If you want to keep it under hwmon, I am fine.
>
Do whatever you want; I won't object. After all, it will be one less file
in the scope of my responsibilities.
I would kindly suggest, though, that it might not be the best idea to list
a hardware monitoring maintainer as maintainer of devicetree property
definitions associated with the regulator subsystem. You might at least
want to make sure that Jean is ok with being listed as maintainer of
this file.
Thanks,
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists