linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] Add light channel for LTR390

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240818170535.7a1aa6b5@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 17:05:35 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Abhash jha <abhashkumarjha123@...il.com>
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, anshulusr@...il.com, lars@...afoo.de,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] Add light channel for LTR390

On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 23:07:37 +0530
Abhash jha <abhashkumarjha123@...il.com> wrote:

> > I think I have.  But with two versions of v7 I'm not 100% sure which one got picked
> > up. I've pushed out now as testing, so take a look.
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git/log/?h=testing  
> > >  
> The two versions v7 patches are the same. I had sent the same thing
> again because
> I thought it might have gotten lost in your mail.
> My apologies for getting you confused.
Ah. Never bother doing that.  Just send a 'ping' to the original
thread.  

Most maintainers now use a lot of automation so tend not to drop messages
any more (it used to happen occasionally). 

Also convention is to wait at least 2 weeks before pinging.

Jonathan

> 
> Thanks,
> Abhash