[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <928aedc4-beb4-467a-b4f5-4df35ff165ea@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 10:24:32 +1200
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<pbonzini@...hat.com>, <seanjc@...gle.com>, <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>,
<rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, <michael.roth@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86: Use is_kvm_hc_exit_enabled() instead of
opencode
On 19/08/2024 10:07 pm, Binbin Wu wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/14/2024 7:18 AM, Huang, Kai wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 13/08/2024 5:12 pm, Binbin Wu wrote:
>>> Use is_kvm_hc_exit_enabled() instead of opencode.
>>>
>>> No functional change intended.
>>
>> It would be helpful to mention currently hypercall_exit_enabled can
>> only have KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE bit set (so that there will be no
>> functional change).
> I think it's not needed, because is_kvm_hc_exit_enabled() takes the input.
> It just replaces the opencode with a helper API.
>
> Maybe your comment was for the patch 1?
>
OK. I guess my brain wasn't very clear, feel free to ignore :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists