[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d7995584-f844-4a05-99d7-a3a85ef11516@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:07:42 +0800
From: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
seanjc@...gle.com, isaku.yamahata@...el.com, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
michael.roth@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86: Use is_kvm_hc_exit_enabled() instead of
opencode
On 8/14/2024 7:18 AM, Huang, Kai wrote:
>
>
> On 13/08/2024 5:12 pm, Binbin Wu wrote:
>> Use is_kvm_hc_exit_enabled() instead of opencode.
>>
>> No functional change intended.
>
> It would be helpful to mention currently hypercall_exit_enabled can
> only have KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE bit set (so that there will be no
> functional change).
I think it's not needed, because is_kvm_hc_exit_enabled() takes the input.
It just replaces the opencode with a helper API.
Maybe your comment was for the patch 1?
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
>
Thanks for your review.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists