[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <635009b1-df79-2549-8f81-37a5a9913d49@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:07:08 +0800
From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
To: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@...il.com>
CC: <broonie@...nel.org>, <noltari@...il.com>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] spi: bcm63xx: Fix missing pm_runtime_disable()
On 2024/8/19 15:52, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 at 05:55, Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com> wrote:
>>
>> The pm_runtime_disable() is missing in the remove function, add it to
>> align with the probe error path.
>>
>> Fixes: 2d13f2ff6073 ("spi: bcm63xx-spi: fix pm_runtime")
>> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx.c
>> index 289f8a94980b..0531b6f3eef3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx.c
>> @@ -614,6 +614,8 @@ static void bcm63xx_spi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> /* reset spi block */
>> bcm_spi_writeb(bs, 0, SPI_INT_MASK);
>>
>> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>> +
>
> How about using devm_pm_runtime_enable() instead in the probe path?
> Then we don't need to call _disable() manually.
Hi, Jonas
I think that is good. I grep the commit log and there is a example:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240605131533.20037-2-raag.jadav@intel.com/
I'll change it to use devm_pm_runtime_enable() to fix it, thank you!
>
>> /* HW shutdown */
>> clk_disable_unprepare(bs->clk);
>> }
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>
> Best Regards,
> Jonas Gorski
Powered by blists - more mailing lists