linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] soc: qcom: pmic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024081914-exploit-yonder-4d51@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:07:41 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
	Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
	Chris Lew <quic_clew@...cinc.com>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
	Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] soc: qcom: pmic_glink: v6.11-rc bug fixes

On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 04:17:36PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> Amit and Johan both reported a NULL pointer dereference in the
> pmic_glink client code during initialization, and Stephen Boyd pointed
> out the problem (race condition).
> 
> While investigating, and writing the fix, I noticed that
> ucsi_unregister() is called in atomic context but tries to sleep, and I
> also noticed that the condition for when to inform the pmic_glink client
> drivers when the remote has gone down is just wrong.
> 
> So, let's fix all three.
> 
> As mentioned in the commit message for the UCSI fix, I have a series in
> the works that makes the GLINK callback happen in a sleepable context,
> which would remove the need for the clients list to be protected by a
> spinlock, and removing the work scheduling. This is however not -rc
> material...
> 
> In addition to the NULL pointer dereference, there is the -ECANCELED
> issue reported here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/Zqet8iInnDhnxkT9@hovoldconsulting.com/
> I have not yet been able to either reproduce this or convince myself
> that this is the same issue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>

What tree are these to go through?  I can take them through mine, but if
someone else wants to, feel free to route them some other way.

thanks,

greg k-h