[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3427742.1724076489@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:08:09 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com,
"Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@...kajraghav.com>,
brauner@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
chandan.babu@...cle.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
djwong@...nel.org, gost.dev@...sung.com, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
hch@....de, david@...morbit.com, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
yang@...amperecomputing.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, willy@...radead.org, john.g.garry@...cle.com,
cl@...amperecomputing.com, p.raghav@...sung.com, mcgrof@...nel.org,
ryan.roberts@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 00/10] enable bs > ps in XFS
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de> wrote:
> Wouldn't the second truncate end up with a 4k file, and not an 8k?
> IE the resulting file will be:
> After step 1: 8k
> After step 2: 4
> After step 3: 4k
Yes, but the folio should still be an 8K folio, and it is:
> pankaj-5833: netfs_folio: pfn=116fec i=0009e ix=00000-00001 inval-part
as indicated by the inclusive folio index range ix=00000-00001.
The problem is that the bottom four bytes of the file are getting cleared
somewhere. They *should* be "XXXX", but they're all zeros.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists