[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240820102005.4l2j73jpt7lmwloh@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 13:20:05 +0300
From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...e.de>
To: corey@...yard.net
Cc: minyard@....org, openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipmi:ssif: Exit early when there is a SMBus error
On 08-18 12:27, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
>
> >
> > 3) It appears the response to the GET_DEVICE_ID command, though a
> > response is returned, is not valid. The right way to handle this would
> > be to do more validation in the ssif_detect() function. It doesn't do
> > any validation of the response data, and that's really what needs to be
> > done.
> >
>
> do_cmd() in ssif_detect() already do validation. Perhaps,
> ssif_probe() should just not return ENODEV in case of error.
>
Oh, I wanted to say ssif_detect, not ssif_probe.
Regards,
Ivan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists