lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAB9gMfqj2KJ8=dxhKvJewYB8cE04F2y6pqCtHbXnKVJCjTBygQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 10:31:53 -0500
From: Corey Minyard <corey@...yard.net>
To: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...e.de>
Cc: minyard@....org, openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipmi:ssif: Exit early when there is a SMBus error

On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 5:15 AM Ivan T. Ivanov <iivanov@...e.de> wrote:
>
> On 08-18 12:27, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > 3) It appears the response to the GET_DEVICE_ID command, though a
> > > response is returned, is not valid.  The right way to handle this would
> > > be to do more validation in the ssif_detect() function.  It doesn't do
> > > any validation of the response data, and that's really what needs to be
> > > done.
> > >
> >
> > do_cmd() in ssif_detect() already do validation. Perhaps,
> > ssif_probe() should just not return ENODEV in case of error.
> >
>
> Oh, I wanted to say ssif_detect, not ssif_probe.

Yeah, that's probably the right solution.  I'll look at this a bit.
But I see the problem.  Do you want to do a patch, or do you want me
to?

-corey

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ