[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a37644d8-e97f-0c78-ea09-e1b258a0b614@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 22:06:12 +0530
From: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, <vkoul@...nel.org>,
<robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<andersson@...nel.org>, <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
<thara.gopinath@...il.com>, <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, <kees@...nel.org>,
<agross@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>, <quic_varada@...cinc.com>,
<quic_utiwari@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/16] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: add bam_pipe_lock dt
property
On 8/17/2024 2:38 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15/08/2024 10:57, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
>> bam having locking and unlocking mechanism of bam pipes.
>> Upon encountering a descriptor with Lock bit set, the
>> BAM will lock all other pipes not related to the current
>> pipe group, and keep handling the current pipe only until
>> it sees the Un-Lock set , then it will release all locked
>> pipes. The actual locking is done on the new descriptor
>> fetching for publishing, i.e. locked pipe will not fetch
>> new descriptors even if it got event/events adding more
>> descriptors for this pipe.
>>
>> Adding the bam_pipe_lock flag in bam driver to handle
>> Lock and Un-Lock bit set on command descriptor.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Change in [v2]
>>
>> * Added bam_pipe_lock dt property
>>
>> Change in [v1]
>>
>> * This patch was not included in [v1]
>>
>> drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
>> index 5e7d332731e0..1ac7e250bdaa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
>> @@ -389,6 +389,7 @@ struct bam_device {
>> u32 ee;
>> bool controlled_remotely;
>> bool powered_remotely;
>> + bool bam_pipe_lock;
>
> There is no user of this property. It's just no-op. Split your code into
> logical chunks, but logical chunk is not "I add field to structure which
> is not used".
Ok ,will squash this patch accordingly.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists