[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <66bb19a0-00ba-40a5-91ef-73368659b30a@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 11:28:27 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: "lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@...wei.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/14] thermal: core: Rearrange checks in
thermal_bind_cdev_to_trip()
On 21/08/2024 10:49, lihuisong (C) wrote:
[ ... ]
>> - list_for_each_entry(pos2, &thermal_cdev_list, node) {
>> - if (pos2 == cdev)
>> - break;
>> - }
>> + lockdep_assert_held(&thermal_list_lock);
>> - if (tz != pos1 || cdev != pos2)
>> + if (list_empty(&tz->node) || list_empty(&cdev->node))
> The old verification is ensure that tz and cdev already add to
> thermal_tz_list and thermal_cdev_list,respectively.
> Namely, tz and cdev are definitely registered and intialized.
> The check is ok for all untizalized thermal_zone_device and cooling device.
> But the new verification doesn't seem to do that.
If the tz or the cdev are registered then their "->node" is not empty
because they are linked with the thermal_list and cdev_list
So either way is browsing the lists to find the tz/cdev or just check
"->node" is not empty. The latter the faster.
Did I misunderstood your comment ?
[ ... ]
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists