[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gQvSouUcEH7CtxZptKHbRyy4=Nes_SjqAW0S7jOJXHqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 13:11:05 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/14] thermal: core: Drop redundant thermal instance checks
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 1:01 PM Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 19/08/2024 17:52, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >
> > Because the trip and cdev pointers are sufficient to identify a thermal
> > instance holding them unambiguously, drop the additional thermal zone
> > checks from two loops walking the list of thermal instances in a
> > thermal zone.
> >
> > No intentional functional impact.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
>
> I'm wondering if the thermal_instance 'tz' field could be removed too ?
It is used in a debug printk in __thermal_cdev_update(). If that
message can be dropped, then yes, but that would be a separate patch
anyway.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists