[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zsd8vqCrTh5h69rp@x1>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 15:00:30 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>
Cc: adrian.hunter@...el.com, irogers@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] perf trace: Add a new argument to
trace__btf_scnprintf()
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 09:36:21AM +0800, Howard Chu wrote:
> Pass the struct syscall_arg, so that we can use the augmented_arg later
> in the struct augmentation.
Breaks the build with:
builtin-trace.c: In function ‘trace__btf_scnprintf’:
builtin-trace.c:1011:78: error: unused parameter ‘arg’ [-Werror=unused-parameter]
1011 | size_t size, int val, struct syscall_arg *arg, char *type)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
LD /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/perf-util-in.o
LD /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/perf-util-in.o
AR /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/libperf-util.a
GEN /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/python/perf.cpython-312-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
So we either use __maybe_unused at this point or combine it with the
patch where it really gets used. I think the later is better, will do.
- Arnaldo
> Signed-off-by: Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> index 84c7398312d8..4bde40f91531 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> @@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ static size_t btf_enum_scnprintf(const struct btf_type *type, struct btf *btf, c
> }
>
> static size_t trace__btf_scnprintf(struct trace *trace, struct syscall_arg_fmt *arg_fmt, char *bf,
> - size_t size, int val, char *type)
> + size_t size, int val, struct syscall_arg *arg, char *type)
> {
> if (trace->btf == NULL)
> return 0;
> @@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ static size_t trace__btf_scnprintf(struct trace *trace, struct syscall_arg_fmt *
> #else // HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
> static size_t trace__btf_scnprintf(struct trace *trace __maybe_unused, struct syscall_arg_fmt *arg_fmt __maybe_unused,
> char *bf __maybe_unused, size_t size __maybe_unused, int val __maybe_unused,
> - char *type __maybe_unused)
> + struct syscall_arg *arg __maybe_unused, char *type __maybe_unused)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -2284,7 +2284,7 @@ static size_t syscall__scnprintf_args(struct syscall *sc, char *bf, size_t size,
> printed += scnprintf(bf + printed, size - printed, "%s: ", field->name);
>
> btf_printed = trace__btf_scnprintf(trace, &sc->arg_fmt[arg.idx], bf + printed,
> - size - printed, val, field->type);
> + size - printed, val, &arg, field->type);
> if (btf_printed) {
> printed += btf_printed;
> continue;
> @@ -2986,7 +2986,7 @@ static size_t trace__fprintf_tp_fields(struct trace *trace, struct evsel *evsel,
> if (trace->show_arg_names)
> printed += scnprintf(bf + printed, size - printed, "%s: ", field->name);
>
> - btf_printed = trace__btf_scnprintf(trace, arg, bf + printed, size - printed, val, field->type);
> + btf_printed = trace__btf_scnprintf(trace, arg, bf + printed, size - printed, val, NULL, field->type);
> if (btf_printed) {
> printed += btf_printed;
> continue;
> --
> 2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists