[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c7f0ae83-9490-c9db-e098-6eb18443599f@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 16:29:19 +0800
From: liulongfang <liulongfang@...wei.com>
To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, "jgg@...dia.com"
<jgg@...dia.com>, Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
CC: "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxarm@...neuler.org" <linuxarm@...neuler.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/4] hisi_acc_vfio_pci: register debugfs for hisilicon
migration driver
On 2024/8/14 17:39, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: liulongfang <liulongfang@...wei.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2024 1:29 PM
>> To: alex.williamson@...hat.com; jgg@...dia.com; Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
>> <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>; Jonathan Cameron
>> <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
>> Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
>> linuxarm@...neuler.org; liulongfang <liulongfang@...wei.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH v8 3/4] hisi_acc_vfio_pci: register debugfs for hisilicon
>> migration driver
> ...
>> +static int hisi_acc_vf_dev_read(struct seq_file *seq, void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct device *vf_dev = seq->private;
>> + struct vfio_pci_core_device *core_device = dev_get_drvdata(vf_dev);
>> + struct vfio_device *vdev = &core_device->vdev;
>> + struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device *hisi_acc_vdev =
>> hisi_acc_get_vf_dev(vdev);
>> + size_t vf_data_sz = offsetofend(struct acc_vf_data, padding);
>> + struct acc_vf_data *vf_data = NULL;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + vf_data = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acc_vf_data), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!vf_data)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&hisi_acc_vdev->state_mutex);
>> + ret = hisi_acc_vf_debug_check(seq, vdev);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + mutex_unlock(&hisi_acc_vdev->state_mutex);
>> + goto migf_err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + vf_data->vf_qm_state = hisi_acc_vdev->vf_qm_state;
>> + ret = vf_qm_read_data(&hisi_acc_vdev->vf_qm, vf_data);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + mutex_unlock(&hisi_acc_vdev->state_mutex);
>> + goto migf_err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&hisi_acc_vdev->state_mutex);
>> +
>> + seq_hex_dump(seq, "Dev Data:", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 1,
>> + (unsigned char *)vf_data,
>> + vf_data_sz, false);
>> +
>> + seq_printf(seq,
>> + "acc device:\n"
>> + "device ready: %u\n"
>> + "device opened: %d\n"
>> + "data size: %lu\n",
>> + hisi_acc_vdev->vf_qm_state,
>> + hisi_acc_vdev->dev_opened,
>
> I think the dev_opened will be always true if it reaches here and can be
> removed from here and from hisi_acc_vf_migf_read() as well.
>
> Please don't respin just for this. Let us wait for others to review this.
>
Hello,Alex Williamson and Jason Gunthorpe:
Could you take a moment to review this patch?
Thanks,
Longfang.
> Thanks,
> Shameer
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists