[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bb55e4cb-245f-4e12-b4df-e9cdd06d2f67@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 23:28:40 +0200
From: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>
To: Umang Jain <umang.jain@...asonboard.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] staging: vchiq: Factor out bulk transfer for
VCHIQ_BULK_MODE_WAITING
Hi Umang,
Am 23.08.24 um 17:14 schrieb Umang Jain:
> The bulk transfer is VCHIQ_BULK_MODE_WAITING is used by VCHIQ ioctl
> interface. It is factored out to a separate function from
> vchiq_bulk_transfer() to bulk_xfer_waiting_interruptible().
>
> This is a part of vchiq_bulk_transfer refactoring. Each bulk mode
> will have their dedicated functions to execute bulk transfers.
> Each mode will be handled separately in subsequent patches.
>
> bulk_xfer_waiting_interruptible() is suffixed with "_interruptible"
> to denote that it can be interrupted when a signal is received.
> -EAGAIN maybe returned in those cases, similar to what
> vchiq_bulk_transfer() does.
>
> Adjust the vchiq_irq_queue_bulk_tx_rx() in the vchiq-dev.c to call
> bulk_xfer_waiting_interruptible() for waiting mode. A temporary
> goto label has been introduced to jump the call execution over
> vchiq_bulk_transfer() for waiting mode only. When all dedicated bulk
> transfer calls are introduced, this label shall be dropped.
>
> No function changes intended in this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@...asonboard.com>
> ---
> .../vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++---
> .../vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.h | 4 ++
> .../vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c | 5 +++
> 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.c
> index 50af04b217f4..228a41ecf90c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.c
> @@ -3023,10 +3023,6 @@ int vchiq_bulk_transfer(struct vchiq_instance *instance, unsigned int handle,
> bulk_waiter->actual = 0;
> bulk_waiter->bulk = NULL;
> break;
> - case VCHIQ_BULK_MODE_WAITING:
> - bulk_waiter = userdata;
> - bulk = bulk_waiter->bulk;
> - goto waiting;
> default:
> goto error_exit;
> }
> @@ -3115,7 +3111,6 @@ int vchiq_bulk_transfer(struct vchiq_instance *instance, unsigned int handle,
> state->id, service->localport, dir_char, queue->local_insert,
> queue->remote_insert, queue->process);
>
> -waiting:
> vchiq_service_put(service);
>
> status = 0;
> @@ -3143,6 +3138,53 @@ int vchiq_bulk_transfer(struct vchiq_instance *instance, unsigned int handle,
> return status;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * This function is called by VCHIQ ioctl interface and is interruptible.
> + * It may receive -EAGAIN to indicate that a signal has been received
> + * and the call should be retried after being returned to user context.
> + */
> +int
> +bulk_xfer_waiting_interruptible(struct vchiq_instance *instance, unsigned int handle,
> + void *userdata)
> +{
> + struct vchiq_service *service = find_service_by_handle(instance, handle);
> + struct bulk_waiter *bulk_waiter = NULL;
I think there is no need to init bulk_waiter with NULL
> + struct vchiq_bulk *bulk;
> + int status = -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!service)
> + goto error_exit;
> +
> + if (!userdata)
> + goto error_exit;
> +
> + if (service->srvstate != VCHIQ_SRVSTATE_OPEN)
> + goto error_exit;
> +
> + if (vchiq_check_service(service))
> + goto error_exit;
> +
> + bulk_waiter = userdata;
> + bulk = bulk_waiter->bulk;
> +
> + vchiq_service_put(service);
> +
> + status = 0;
> +
> + bulk_waiter->bulk = bulk;
Maybe i missed something, but before vchiq_service_put() we already
assigned the other way around.
> + if (wait_for_completion_interruptible(&bulk_waiter->event))
> + status = -EAGAIN;
> + else if (bulk_waiter->actual == VCHIQ_BULK_ACTUAL_ABORTED)
> + status = -EINVAL;
> +
> + return status;
How about return the return code directly at these 3 places? This would
improve readability.
Best regards
> +
> +error_exit:
> + if (service)
> + vchiq_service_put(service);
> + return status;
> +}
> +
> int
> vchiq_queue_message(struct vchiq_instance *instance, unsigned int handle,
> ssize_t (*copy_callback)(void *context, void *dest,
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.h b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.h
> index 77cc4d7ac077..1fda8631d1b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.h
> @@ -470,6 +470,10 @@ vchiq_shutdown_internal(struct vchiq_state *state, struct vchiq_instance *instan
> extern void
> remote_event_pollall(struct vchiq_state *state);
>
> +extern int
> +bulk_xfer_waiting_interruptible(struct vchiq_instance *instance, unsigned int handle,
> + void *userdata);
> +
> extern int
> vchiq_bulk_transfer(struct vchiq_instance *instance, unsigned int handle, void *offset,
> void __user *uoffset, int size, void *userdata, enum vchiq_bulk_mode mode,
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c
> index 9cd2a64dce5e..445b7938eea3 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c
> @@ -324,6 +324,10 @@ static int vchiq_irq_queue_bulk_tx_rx(struct vchiq_instance *instance,
> dev_dbg(service->state->dev, "arm: found bulk_waiter %pK for pid %d\n",
> waiter, current->pid);
> userdata = &waiter->bulk_waiter;
> +
> + status = bulk_xfer_waiting_interruptible(instance, args->handle, userdata);
> +
> + goto bulk_transfer_handled;
> } else {
> userdata = args->userdata;
> }
> @@ -331,6 +335,7 @@ static int vchiq_irq_queue_bulk_tx_rx(struct vchiq_instance *instance,
> status = vchiq_bulk_transfer(instance, args->handle, NULL, args->data, args->size,
> userdata, args->mode, dir);
>
> +bulk_transfer_handled:
> if (!waiter) {
> ret = 0;
> goto out;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists