linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] rust: support for shadow call stack sanitizer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240823122423.GB32110@willie-the-truck>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 13:24:24 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Jamie Cunliffe <Jamie.Cunliffe@....com>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
	Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
	Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
	Valentin Obst <kernel@...entinobst.de>,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] rust: support for shadow call stack sanitizer

On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 05:13:58PM +0200, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 4:35 PM Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 10:01:44AM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> > > diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> > > index fe76c5d0a72e..d857f6f90885 100644
> > > --- a/init/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/init/Kconfig
> > > @@ -1909,7 +1909,7 @@ config RUST
> > >       depends on !MODVERSIONS
> > >       depends on !GCC_PLUGINS
> > >       depends on !RANDSTRUCT
> > > -     depends on !SHADOW_CALL_STACK
> > > +     depends on !SHADOW_CALL_STACK || RUSTC_VERSION >= 108000 && UNWIND_PATCH_PAC_INTO_SCS
> >
> > Sorry, I didn't spot this in v4, but since UNWIND_PATCH_PAC_INTO_SCS is
> > specific to arm64 and the only other architecture selecting
> > ARCH_SUPPORTS_SHADOW_CALL_STACK is riscv, I can't help but feel it would
> > be cleaner to move this logic into the arch code selecting HAVE_RUST.
> >
> > That is, it's up to the architecture to make sure that it has whatever
> > it needs for SCS to work with Rust if it claims to support Rust.
> >
> > What do you think?
> 
> The `select RUST if ...` is going to get really complicated if we
> apply that rule in general. Having options here allows us to split
> them across several `depends on` clauses. I'm not sure it will even
> work, I had issues with cyclic Kconfig errors previously. I also don't
> think it's unreasonable for the architecture to say it supports both
> options when it really does support both; they are just mutually
> exclusive. I also think there is value in having all of the options
> that Rust doesn't work with in one place.

I'm not sure I follow why this will get really complicated. Isn't it as
straightforward as the diff below, or did I miss something?

Will

--->8

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index a2f8ff354ca6..2f5702cb9dac 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ config ARM64
        select HAVE_FUNCTION_ARG_ACCESS_API
        select MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
        select HAVE_RSEQ
-       select HAVE_RUST if CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN
+       select HAVE_RUST if RUSTC_SUPPORTS_ARM64
        select HAVE_STACKPROTECTOR
        select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
        select HAVE_KPROBES
@@ -265,6 +265,11 @@ config ARM64
        help
          ARM 64-bit (AArch64) Linux support.
 
+config RUSTC_SUPPORTS_ARM64
+       bool
+       depends on CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN
+       depends on !SHADOW_CALL_STACK || RUSTC_VERSION >= 108000 && UNWIND_PATCH_PAC_INTO_SC
+
 config CLANG_SUPPORTS_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
        def_bool CC_IS_CLANG
        # https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1507
diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
index 0f3cd7c3a436..93858dbfefc0 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ config RISCV
        select HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API
        select HAVE_RETHOOK if !XIP_KERNEL
        select HAVE_RSEQ
-       select HAVE_RUST if 64BIT
+       select HAVE_RUST if 64BIT && !SHADOW_CALL_STACK
        select HAVE_SAMPLE_FTRACE_DIRECT
        select HAVE_SAMPLE_FTRACE_DIRECT_MULTI
        select HAVE_STACKPROTECTOR
diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index 5783a0b87517..3ada33b1d681 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -1902,7 +1902,6 @@ config RUST
        depends on !MODVERSIONS
        depends on !GCC_PLUGINS
        depends on !RANDSTRUCT
-       depends on !SHADOW_CALL_STACK
        depends on !DEBUG_INFO_BTF || PAHOLE_HAS_LANG_EXCLUDE
        help
          Enables Rust support in the kernel.