[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240826173143.CxUkM4j0@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 19:31:43 +0200
From: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
To: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
Cc: Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -fixes] drivers: perf: Fix smp_processor_id() use in
preemptible code
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 06:52:10PM +0200, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> As reported in [1], the use of smp_processor_id() in
> pmu_sbi_device_probe() must be protected by disabling the preemption, so
> simple use get_cpu()/put_cpu() instead.
>
> Reported-by: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20240820074925.ReMKUPP3@linutronix.de/ [1]
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
Tested-by: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
I think this also needs:
Fixes: a8625217a054 ("drivers/perf: riscv: Implement SBI PMU snapshot function")
Best regards,
Nam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists